 
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" |
| Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2010 19:35:16 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We use the default rendition numbers for digital media. But for physical media we use our image numbers. This makes it easy to search for a specific image in the Media module in order to locate its associated object record.
Angelika R. Kuettner
Associate Registrar for Collections Documentation and Imaging
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
Post Office Box 1776
Williamsburg, Virginia 23187
Phone: 757.565.8495
Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
________________________________
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Maja Clark [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 6:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Use of Media Rendition #
Hi All,
For rendition numbers, we’ve been using the default auto-generated format: R.current year-next sequential number, e.g., R.2010-1, R.2010-2, etc..
Does anyone use a different numbering convention? I admit, perhaps revealing great ignorance, that I’ve never needed to run a query based on rendition #. I’m wondering how rendition #s can be particularly useful & whether modifying the default numbering format is worth considering.
Many thanks,
Maja
Maja Clark
Collections Manager, Shangri La
Doris Duke Foundation for Islamic Art
4055 Papu Circle
Honolulu, HI 96816
(808) 792-5506
www.shangrilahawaii.org<http://www.shangrilahawaii.org/>
|
|
|
