TMSUSERS Archives

The Museum System (TMS) Users

TMSUSERS@SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Suzanne Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Museum System (TMS) Users
Date:
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:59:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Our collection includes a large number of European, American, and Asian
decorative arts as well as ethnographic collections, so probably half our
collection would be technically "unknown" makers. Instead of using unknown,
we include in object-related consituents whatever is known about the maker.
We have consituent types of Individual, Institution, Location, and Culture.
One example for an object would be a link to Culture "Songye people" and
Location "Democratic Republic of Congo." The maker information then appears
consistently with our label copy, and people can effectively search on
whatever is known about the object. (We do also structure geography
attributes in consistuents, but that does not take the place of the location
constituents; it provides other search features.)

For decorative arts, we might have a maker of simply "England" if that is
all that is known.

For variations on attributions, we have a constituent role of "attributed"
and then the prefix is customized to either "Attributed to" or "Possibly" or
"Probably" depending on the curator's preference and how much is known about
the object origins.

Suzanne Stephens
Database Administrator
Birmingham Museum of Art

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephanie Hansen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 5:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 'Unknown' Constituent Records


Dear TMS list-serv,

I'm hoping we can pick up on this old topic again to help me make a decision

on how which field(s) to use for our decorative arts/sculpture "unknown" 
constituents. We wouldn't normally display "unknown" for dec arts-but 
rather "Costal New England, probably Salem, Massachusetts, or Portsmouth, 
New Hampshire" for example. Does anyone else list a place instead of 
an "unknown" constituent like this?

The problem is-that most of them are more than 48 charaters 
(prefix/suffix/culture) and most of them have qualifiers 
like "possibly", "probably", "or", etc.-so they don't work in the geography
fields 
either. I'm also afraid it will get too "out of sight/out of mind" in text
entries or 
a udf.

Do any of you have constituents that refer to a place-or has anyone come up 
with a good solution to listings such as the above?

Many thanks for any advice!!

Stephanie Hansen
Milwaukee Art Museum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2