TMSUSERS Archives

The Museum System (TMS) Users

TMSUSERS@SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Suzanne Quigley (" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Museum System (TMS) Users
Date:
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 19:05:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
I don't think true Boolean is an option here.  But please, please, someone,
prove me wrong.  The only way I have been able to do this is by 'anding'
everything together.
 
suzanne
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Amy Noel [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 7:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: "and not" queries
 
 
Hello fellow TMS Users,
 
I'm wondering if we are one of a few TMS users for whom some query functions
do not work.  Particualry,  "and not" queries do not work on large number of
records and CLOB fields, like object packages.  This means that end users
(who do not use SQL worksheet) cannot eliminate an Object Package from a
larger selection or query "and not *" on some fields.
 
Is there anyone who has this problem and found a way around it within the
application?  I don't see our average TMS user learning SQL.  This is
becoming more of an issue for us as our number of in-house staff learn and
use TMS continues to grow.
 
Thanks,
Amy Noel
CIS Application Manager
The J. Paul Getty Museum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2