The National Portrait Gallery hasn't standardized the Bibliography
reference number field, since 1,063 of our 1,073 bibliographic records
came from legacy data and are still skeletal. Very few of our records
even have reference numbers entered. Since the Bibliography reference
number field is called "CallNumber" in the SQL table, we add our library
call number (based on the LOC number) whenever possible. We will
probably go with the LOC number if we ever start using the Bibiography
module seriously. (We will do this sooner if the module becomes truly
relational, i.e. if we can access it from within the Objects or
Constituents Module even when no prior links exist.)

 

Object Level is blank (or "not defined") for most of our objects. We use
the field only to single out objects that are part of a group or that
are groups themselves. Only two choices are available in our dropdown:
"Part of group" and "Group of objects". If "Group of Objects" is
entered, then the Object Count is something greater than 1.

 

As for Object Type, we have made the field disappear via securities but
might consider using it in the future for distinguishing between
portraits and non-portraits in our collection or something like that.

 

________________________________

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jeri Moxley
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 8:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Bibliography module and object type/level

 

Hi Kelly,

 

I don't know why, really, but we enter the ISBN as the Bibliography
reference number. It's just always been done that way here (since before
my Gugg time).

 

We use Object Type in concert with Classification - our usage actually
being somewhat the opposite of CDWA in that for us Object Type is
slightly more generic than Classification (this also has been this way
since my Gugg time). An example would be: object type 'work on paper' =
classification 'print'. That said, however, we have been discussing
these fields off and on in Curatorial, Registrar, and Conservation
meetings for the past couple of years and hope to eventually revise both
object type and classification lists to better defined / standardized
terms - with my personal dream of throwing thesaurus usage into the mix.

 

We've renamed Object Level to 'Special Collection' and have populated
this drop-down list with major acquisitions (e.g., Founding Collection,
Thannhauser Collection). This provides a quick search for these
collections which in some cases require additional approvals for loan or
exhibition. 

 

Until you decide how they might be useful for your collections, you
could close the fields off in security.

 

Regards,

Jeri

__________

Jeri L. Moxley-Rojas 
Manager of Collection and Exhibition Information 
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum 
o: (212) 423-3509 
c: (646) 912-3365 
[log in to unmask] 

 

 

________________________________

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Kelly Rushing
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 10:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Bibliography module and object type/level

We have just started using the bibliography module in TMS and are
wondering what to use as the reference number for each record.  Our
first instinct was to use the catalog number that our library assigns to
the book.  However, many times when I enter the record, the book won't
have been catalogued yet, so if we want to use their number, I would
have to leave it blank and go back later.  The library uses the Dewey
Decimal system, so I can't find the number inside the book, as you often
can with the Library of Congress number.  I'm wondering what other
museums are using for this field: the library's number, a sequential
numbering system, or something else entirely?

 

I would also like to know how others are handling the object type and
object level fields.  We aren't currently using them, but it bugs me
that I have to choose "not defined" if I click on those fields when I'm
entering a new object.  Has anyone else found them to be useful, and if
so, what options have you entered?  It is possible to rename them and
use them for something else?

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Kelly Rushing

Registrar

Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art

500 W. Washington St.

Indianapolis, IN  46204

Phone: 317-275-1359

Fax: 317-275-1459