Locate the information or alter the information? I ask for clarification
because they are different.

 

If they only want to locate the information, I might suggest creating a
custom report that lists the bibliography. (Of course the same
information is only "Related > Bibliography" away)

 

Chad M Petrovay

Collections Database Administrator

The Walters Art Museum

600 North Charles Street

Baltimore, MD  21210

P: 410.547.9000 x266

F: 410.837.4846

[log in to unmask]

 

www.thewalters.org <http://www.thewalters.org/> 

 

Exhibitions:

Maps: Finding our Place in the World on view March 16-June 8, 2008

Maps on Purpose on view March 1-June 8, 2008

Beyond the Compass, Beyond the Square on view March 16-May 20, 2008

Mapping the Cosmos: Images from the Hubble Space Telescope on view now
through July 27, 2008

 

-----Original Message-----
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Burke, Ashley
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:55 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Bibliography and Exhibition text fields.

 

Thanks for your responses.  I am really looking for an argument to not
use these fields, since I also agree that they should be only used for
legacy data- not for a duplication of information. One of the arguments
for using the fields here has been so that curators or others not as
familiar with TMS can easily locate the same information in the Objects
module...

 

Please note new email address: [log in to unmask]

 

Ashley Burke

Assistant Registrar

The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art

5401 Bay Shore Rd.

Sarasota, FL 34243

941-359-5700 ext. 1504

[log in to unmask]

 

This e-mail is subject to the Sunshine Act and its contents may be
subject to public disclosure.

 

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Jay Hoffman
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 10:49 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Bibliography and Exhibition text fields.

 

Yes, this is exactly why those fields are there. Often, legacy data are
stored there from a data conversion, but the structured approach is
preferred. If you don't need these fields, you could re-purpose them by
renaming them, if you have need of another text field.

 

 

________________________________

From: Chad Petrovay
Sent: Fri 5/9/2008 10:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Bibliography and Exhibition text fields.

I think these text blocks are a vestige from an early edition of TMS,
before the corresponding modules were added. These fields are populated
with data brought over during our conversion, but it was also parsed and
collocated into the corresponding modules.

 

I have made these fields view only to all users, so they can review any
information, but must use the Bibliography and Exhibition modules to
make additions. One of my main arguments was that the modules provided
better searchability, but also required less maintenance then the
text-fields in the object record. One exhibition or bibliography record
cross-referenced to multiple object records beats having to edit each
object record individually.

 

Chad M Petrovay

Collections Database Administrator

The Walters Art Museum

600 North Charles Street

Baltimore, MD  21210

P: 410.547.9000 x266

F: 410.837.4846

[log in to unmask]

 

http://www.thewalters.org/

 

Exhibitions:

Maps: Finding our Place in the World on view March 16-June 8, 2008

Maps on Purpose on view March 1-June 8, 2008

Beyond the Compass, Beyond the Square on view March 16-May 20, 2008

Mapping the Cosmos: Images from the Hubble Space Telescope on view now
through July 27, 2008

 

-----Original Message-----
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Burke, Ashley
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Bibliography and Exhibition text fields.

 

Hello TMS Users-

I have a question about how other users have dealt with the Exhibition
and Bibliographic text fields in the object module of TMS.  I would
prefer to not use these fields because the information is already
captured in the Exhibition module and Bibliographic module and attached
to the Object records (allowing for better searching).  We are trying to
decide whether to repeat the information and also add to those the text
fields.  How have other institutions dealt with this and what was your
argument for not using?      

Any information is appreciated!

Thanks

Ashley

 

Ashley Burke

Assistant Registrar

The John and Mable Ringling Museum of Art

5401 Bay Shore Rd.

Sarasota, FL 34243

941-359-5700 ext. 1504

[log in to unmask]

 

This e-mail is subject to the Sunshine Act and its contents may be
subject to public disclosure.