Jeff,
As a quick answer - I would say TMS
Components should be used when digital works are copied to various forms of
backup media. For example, if a digital video file exists on a hard drive as
well as backup DVDs, each of these physical objects (disks) can be considered
"carriers" of the original work of art, which can exist in more than
one place by its digital nature. The physical location of each of the carriers
should then be tracked through separate component records, each of which has
its own metadata and location history.
I think your question touches on
digital preservation and may warrant a dialogue beyond the listserv. Would anyone
be interested in participating in a GoToMeeting conference call/web
presentation to discuss it with others? We would be happy to host and moderate
such a discussion if there is interest.
Best,
Jay
Jay Hoffman, CEO
Gallery Systems
261 West 35th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10001
+1.646.733.2733
From: The Museum System
(TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jeffrey
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:35 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Location for digital works
Is anyone using TMS yet to track
the location of works that exist as digital files (i.e., computer or video
artworks delivered by an artist as files?) At the moment, we have a few works
that were delivered on various forms of hard drive, and as long as they reside
there, it’s not difficult to track them, in theory. When works are moved
onto other drives, servers, etc., that are not dedicated—that’s
what I’m starting to think about. Any suggestions are welcome.
Best,
Jeff Martin
Contract Conservator
Hirshhorn Museum & Sculpture Garden