We took exactly the opposite
approach here, for better or worse. Our reasoning came to a belief that we
wanted to have a one-to-one relationship between every non-virtual record in
TMS to every “countable” object in the collection. We consider a two-sided
drawing to be one object in terms of the collection count, so we kept it as one
record in TMS. The object number will have an “A” and a “B”, to indicate that
there are two sides, but we didn’t want to create two separate records and run
the chance of someone make a location change for one without doing the same for
the other.
I’ll be very curious to see
Danielle’s webinar on separable objects. It could be that once TMS can accommodate
the distinction we will change our approach as well. This will, of course,
also increase our object count if we approach it consistently, but it might be
more accurate to consider each page in a sketchbook as a countable work of art
as well as each side of a double-sided drawing.
David
David Aylsworth
Collections Registar
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston
tel: 713-639-7824
fax: 713-639-7780
Presenting North Looks South:
Building the Latin American Art Collection
on view June 7 – September 27,
2009
From: The Museum System
(TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrea
Liguori
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Recto/Verso Objects
We also treat
each side as separate objects, giving them the same number but with the
addition of an R or V, e.g. 2343R and 2434V. We do this for many
reasons: differing mediums, different creation dates, and in some cases
differing dimensions due to different orientation. A fringe benefit of
maintaining separate records is the ease of searching for all 2-sided works by
querying on *R or *V.
Andrea Liguori
Director of Research|Associate Editor
Richard Diebenkorn Catalogue Raisonne
3200 College Ave #2, Berkeley, CA 94705
510 428 1400 tel
510 428 1401 fax
From: Alexis Lenk <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:13:54 AM
Subject: Recto/Verso Objects
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone can share how they treat
recto/verso objects in TMS (e.g. two drawings – one on each side of a single
sheet of paper). We have done it a few different ways and are looking to
standardize our rules if possible.
Does anyone use: a single record with the information for
both drawings crammed in? components? two separate records linked together (or
to a third parent r/v record)?
The advantages to having 2 distinct records seems to be
better management of the cataloguing data of each drawing, with the ability to
attach specific images to that data. The advantages to having a single record
seem to be better management of conservation reports, managing locations and
loans, etc.
Thanks for any thoughts.
Alexis Lenk
Coordonnatrice, Documentation des
collections
Centre Canadian d’Architecture
Montréal, Québec
(514) 939-7000 ext. 1520