David,
In TMS 9.38 there
is a new object relationship called “separable object.” One of the main features of separable
objects is that, when you move one, you get an alert asking if you also want to
move all related co-located separable objects. In this case co-located simply means related
separable objects currently in the same location.
This feature was
initially designed to manage things like print portfolios but I can see how it
could also be used to manage frames created as separable object records related
to the primary object record.
Danielle
Uchitelle
Managing
Director
Gallery Systems
261 W. 35th Street
New York, NY 10001-1902
Tel: 646 733 2239 x264
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Sarah Yukich
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:35
PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Frames as separate
objects
It’s a
great idea David.
We have had the
same issue with artwork frames, and have recently decided to remove frames as
object components.
I would also be
keen to hear of any solutions people have in dealing with frames, such as David
as indicated.
Sarah
Sarah E. Yukich | Kerry Stokes Collection
t: +61 8 9215 8853 | f: +61 8 9215 8898 | e: [log in to unmask]
Australian Capital Equity Pty. Limited | PO Box 1398 West Perth Western Australia
6872
From:
The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Aylsworth, David
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 5:28
AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Frames as separate
objects
A
week or so ago, there was a thread going for those of you who made individual
records for non-art components of a work of art (frame, crate, pedestal, mount,
etc.).
I
am leaning towards starting a global policy here whereby EVERY frame in our
museum would have a unique record in TMS, whether it lived on its work of art
or not. The frame would be linked to the object, and if a frame was used
over and over again, could be linked to multiple objects, creating a history of
use for the frame.
It
seems to me that if EVERY frame were not entered separately—even those
frames that are never removed from a painting—people who move the objects
would easily get confused as to knowing when to do a location change for a
frame and when not to. If the frames are linked to the object, an art
handler who moves a painting with a frame can easily toggle over to the record
for the frame and make that location change as well.
BUT
how do you handle moving entire groups of objects, like moving an entire
exhibition or object package worth of objects if whoever made the exhibition
record or object package didn’t add the frame records? Is there a
way of calling for all of the “related” objects for ALL of the
records in a group?
Am
I nuts for thinking this is a good idea?
Thanks
in advance for your wisdom and insight…
David
David
Aylsworth
Collections
Registar
Museum
of Fine Arts, Houston
tel:
713-639-7824
fax:
713-639-7780
Presenting North Looks South: Building the Latin American Art Collection
on view June 7 – September 27,
2009