Dear all,

 

Is anyone linking records in TMS for works, in this case, photographs with unidentified sitters/models that have the same unidentified model in another photograph? The other relationship is for photographs that are related through successive frames/captured at the same time.

 

Many thanks

 

Liana

 

 

Liana Radvak

Manager, Collection Information & Resources

Art Gallery of Ontario

317 Dundas St. West

Toronto, ON. M5T 1G4

416.979.6660 x.463

 

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Stephanie
Sent: August 11, 2011 5:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Linking Object Records

 

Hi Alexis,

Here’s ours:

Relation1

Relation2

Rel1Prep

Rel2Prep

Book

Book accessory

Accessories for the book

Book includes

See Also

See Also

See Also

See Also

Group

Part of a group

Works included in the group

Group contains

Album

Part of an album

Works included in the album

Album includes

Preparatory material for

Preparatory material is

Preparatory material for

Preparatory material is

Portfolio

Part of a portfolio

Works included in the portfolio

Portfolio includes

Series

Part of a series

Works included in the series

Series contains

Set

Part of a set

Works included in the Set

Set contains

Suite

Part of a suite

Works included in the suite

Suite includes

 

Good Luck!

Stephanie

Milwaukee Art Museum

 

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chad Petrovay
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Linking Object Records

 

Alexis,

With Parent-Child relationships, I try to make the terminology of the parts parallel:

Set - Part of a Set
Framed Artwork - Frame
Ensemble - Part of an Ensemble

Displays like this in TMS:

Ensemble
Framed Artwork
Set
-------------
Frame
Part of an Ensemble
Part of a Set

In my experience, even when you have clearly defined relationships written up, people don't always reference them, so making the relationship labels mirror one another helps to clarify their relationships with one another.

~Chad

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Diane Lee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Oh, and I haven’t been using the Group Completeness.  I started to with the Constituent relationships, but it seemed like everything would be incomplete so it wouldn’t be all that useful. And given the type of Object-Object relationships we are now doing it didn’t seem relevant.

 

 

D.

 

==========================================

Diane Lee, Collections Manager 860-236-5621 x242

Connecticut Historical Society


From: Diane Lee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:26 PM
To: 'The Museum System (TMS) Users'
Subject: RE: Linking Object Records

 

I would be interested in what others are doing as well. We use the linking primarily in the Constituents module for actual family relationships between constituents, such as:

Ancestor – Descendant

Aunt – Nephew

Aunt – Niece

Business – Business

Father – Daughter

Father – Son

 

…and so on. (Family relationships between Constituents are very useful considering the types of collections we have.)

 

For Objects we previously had a Parent/Child linking structure set up just as

Related Object – Related Object,

 

but I’ve been working on changing those to a See Also link just as Object - Object since the objects aren’t really related in a Parent/Child structure, but just as something that relates to another object in the collection on an equal level.  I would like to expand the See Also links, as I think they could be useful, so any ideas are welcome, along with seeing what others are doing with the Parent/Child for objects.

 

Diane.

 

==========================================

Diane Lee, Collections Manager 860-236-5621 x242

Connecticut Historical Society


From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Linda Pulliam
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:50 PM

Subject: Re: Linking Object Records

 

Hi Alexis,

 

These are our Parent/Child pairs:

 

Parent-Child

Accessories-Accessories

Exhibit case-Works of art

Final-Prep for final

Mold-Cast

Object-Accessory

Object(s)-Crate

One of pair-One of pair

Original-Reproduction

Part of set-Part of set

Part of whole-Part of whole

Print-Printing surface

Recto-Verso

Same object-Same object

Shared history-Shared history

Virtual object-Real object(s)

 

We do not use the Association Assistant.

 

Good luck with your project.

 

Linda, MFA

 

 

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lenk, Alexis
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Linking Object Records

 

Hello,

 

I’ve recently been rethinking the linking structure between object records in our TMS and I was wondering if anyone would be willing to share the list of relationships they are currently using? I’m interested mainly in the language being used and how specific other users are being with their links. I’m also curious to know if anyone is making use of the “Group Info/Completeness” section of the Association Assistant (setting  the links to “complete”, “incomplete”, “not relevant” or “mixed”)?

 

Any examples would be appreciated. Thanks

 

Alexis Lenk

TMS Administrator

617-384-6762

[log in to unmask]

 

Harvard Art Museums

32 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

www.harvardartmuseums.org

 

 

 

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed. To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.

 

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

signoff TMSUSERS

// eoj

You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.