 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:47:54 -0500 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Sari,
This is exactly how I have specified to distinguish between entries in
the two fields, although I can't really say if our curatorial staff are
following!
--
Stephanie Leverock
Records Manager and Collections Review Coordinator
Brooklyn Museum
200 Eastern Parkway
Brooklyn, NY 11238-6052
Tel: (718) 501-6483
Fax: (718) 501-6135
Cohen, Sari wrote:
>I would like to know how other museums use the published references field vs. the bibliography field. We have been putting bibliographic information for the publications that refer to the object in the published reference field and using the bibliography field for bibliographic sources that do not refer directly to the object, but may be helpful in general research (monographs, etc...). I'm not sure this is the best way to go about it.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>Sari N. Cohen
>Collections Manager
>The Jewish Museum
>1109 Fifth Avenue
>New York, NY 10128
>Tel: (212) 423-3352
>Fax: (212) 423-3316
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|
