TMSUSERS Archives

The Museum System (TMS) Users

TMSUSERS@SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dearolph, Amanda" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Museum System (TMS) Users
Date:
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:54:02 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (8 kB)
LACMA uses "unknown" and we also have an "anonymous" record for curatorial
to use where they think appropriate. I've never had any interest in
"unidentified" expressed to me before but it's an interesting idea.

-A

On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Fidler, Evelyn (KL) <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> I also like the term unidentified versus unknown which is what we
> currently use.
>
> ________________________________
> From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [[log in to unmask]] on
> behalf of Garton, Susan [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 5:58 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Unknown vs Unidentified
>
> The Smithsonian National Portrait Gallery has always used “Unidentified
> Artist”--since way back when we were using a flat file system in the 1970s.
> I’m guessing the standard came from the catalouging guidelines developed by
> NPG’s research archive, the Catalog of American Portraits, but I’d have to
> really dig to find the documentation.
>
>
> [cid:image001.png@01D16E4E.942FCC80]<http://npg.si.edu/>
>
> Sue Garton
> Data Administrator and Acting Head of
> Collections Information & Research Archive
> Smithsonian
> National Portrait Gallery
>
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>  |  202.633.8554
>
> From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Nicola Astles
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:24 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Unknown vs Unidentified
>
> Hi Fatima,
>
> Our director also prefers "Unidentified" over "Unknown" artist and we've
> been making the change in TMS.
>
> I suppose it's a subtle difference, but I like "unidentified" because it
> implies the artist's identity could still be discovered, while "unknown"
> sounds more final, like the museum has given up trying to learn more about
> the object.
>
> I'd be curious to hear what other institutions are doing as well.
>
>
>
> Nicola Astles
> Museum Content and Technology Administrator
> New-York Historical Society
> 170 Central Park West
> New York, New York 10024
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> 212-873-3400 x338
>
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Mahdi, Fatima (VMFA) <
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Is anyone at an institution that is using “Artist: Unidentified” in TMS
> and/or on object labels for unidentified artists rather than “Artist:
> Unknown”? Has anyone noticed a move in the direction of “Unidentified”, or
> does anyone know of any discussion of this issue online or in print?
>
> One of our curators is in favor of “Unidentified”, and I like it better,
> too, but it will be easier to sway the institution if we can say that
> others are thinking along these lines.
>
> Thanks, All!
>
>
> Fatima Mahdi
> Collections Information Specialist/TMS
> [VMFA-web-sig]
> Virginia Museum of Fine Arts
> 200 N. Boulevard <https://maps.google.com/?q=
> 200+N.+Boulevard+%0D+Richmond,+VA+23220&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Richmond, VA 23220<https://maps.google.com/?q=200+N.+Boulevard+%0D+
> Richmond,+VA+23220&entry=gmail&source=g>-4007
> T 804.340.1443<tel:(804)%20340-1443>
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask]<mailto:
> [log in to unmask]> with the following commands in the body of
> the email:
>
> signoff TMSUSERS
>
> // eoj
>
> You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.
>
>
> [http://email.nyhscommunications.org/email/Vietnam-Footer2-452x125.jpg]<h
> ttp://www.nyhistory.org/exhibitions/vietnam-war-1945-1975>To unsubscribe,
> send an email to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]
> si.edu> with the following commands in the body of the email:
>
> signoff TMSUSERS
>
> // eoj
>
> You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.
>
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask]<mailto:
> [log in to unmask]> with the following commands in the body of
> the email:
>
> signoff TMSUSERS
>
> // eoj
>
> You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.
>
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the
> following commands in the body of the email:
>
>      signoff TMSUSERS
>
>      //  eoj
>
>
> You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.
>



-- 

*AMANDA DEAROLPH*

DATABASE ADMINISTRATOR
COLLECTION INFORMATION & DIGITAL ASSETS
WWW.LACMA.ORG

T: 323.857.4758
E: [log in to unmask]

To unsubscribe, send an email to [log in to unmask] with the following commands in the body of the email:

     signoff TMSUSERS

     //  eoj


You will receive a confirmation that your subscription has been removed.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2