LISTSERV - TMSUSERS Archives - SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU

TMSUSERS Archives

The Museum System (TMS) Users

TMSUSERS@SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	TMSUSERS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show HTML Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: Object Package Names
From:	"Glosson, Eunice" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	The Museum System (TMS) Users
Date:	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:13:16 -0400
Content-Type:	multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (1006 bytes) , text/html (3781 bytes)

I totally agree with the idea of folders.  I hope this is something in the hopper for future.

Eunice Glosson, Registrar
Colonial Williamsburg

From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ryan Donahue
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 11:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Object Package Names

We are actually looking at this problem now, folders would be a really welcome addition to object packages (that is to say, a hierarchical organization for object packages).

Our present plan is to expose a web interface for un/archiving object packages on demand (we already have such an interface for transferring object packages to our DAM).

My other thought was to treat global object packages like a communal fridge -- periodically (2x year?) turning all global object packages (with some exception) non-global, and letting people bug my department when they need it (or use the web interface) to turn object packages back on.

-Ryan Donahue
George Eastman House

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

SI-LISTSERV.SI.EDU