Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | The Museum System (TMS) Users |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:41:29 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As it is often an exhibition copy (which we would have entered as a component), rather than the entire artwork, that is destroyed, we use a Location of "destroyed" for the relevant component.
-----Original Message-----
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Linda Pulliam
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Destroyed "Objects"
Hi Alexis:
We use an Object Status called: Disposed, and we write an explanation of the situation in the Source Notes field.
Linda Pulliam
Head of Collections Management
Musuem of Fine Arts, Boston
From: The Museum System (TMS) Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alexis Lenk
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:40 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Destroyed "Objects"
Hello,
A quick question: When "objects", which have TMS records, need to be destroyed (such as in the case of reproductions of objects created for exhibition purposes), how do you indicate this is TMS?
We are considering indicating "deaccessioned" in Object Status, but I am not sure it is specific enough without further explanation in another field. Does anyone use Object Status "destroyed", or something else?
We do not want to delete the object records themselves.
Thanks
Alexis Lenk
Coordonnatrice, Documentation des Collections
Centre Canadian d'Architecture
Montréal, Québec
(514) 939-7000 ext. 1520
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|